Sign Rulership

Sign Rulership with Hellenistic Planetary Order

Excerpt from book, Foundations of Astrology, on Amazon

By ©Naomi C Bennett

It is well known that the Egyptians started their solar year at 0 degree Cancer. This was the time of the annual flooding of the Nile, the reappearance of Sirius, the star of Isis and the season to plant crops.  They made the southern boundary of Egypt fall on the exact position of the Tropic of Cancer on the first Cataract of the Nile and then they extended the north boundary of Egypt exactly 7 degrees latitude because Mercury had the most extreme latitude of the visible planets.  Mercury defined the width of the zodiac belt to be a total of 14 degrees and they associated Mercury as the God of Measurement.1

The sign of Cancer was very important to the Egyptians and they assigned the Moon as its ruler. The next sign of Leo was given to the Sun, then the assignment of Mercury to Virgo, Venus to Libra, and Mars to Scorpio, etc.  This drove me crazy in my first studies back in the 1960’s.  Why, why did they give the planetary order as Moon, Sun, Mercury, Venus, Mars, etc.?  Any basic education given in elementary school shows us the solar system in the order of Sun, Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, etc.  Were they stupid and didn’t know any better?  It’s impossible for the Sun to be closer to the Earth than Venus or Mercury!

solarsystem1

Heliocentric Solar System

The Egyptians had studied the skies for more than 4,000 years.  How could they get this so wrong?  They were obsessed with the sky and creating Heaven on Earth.  They knew the circumference of the Earth and that the Earth flatten at the poles!  The Great Pyramid is aligned exactly to the cardinal directions.  Only modern instruments can get as exact as the Egyptians did in the Age of Taurus!  What is wrong with this picture?

In 1992 I began a quest to confirm astrological theories that I had been taught, find their actual basis and verify the proof.  In the 1990s, I acquired over 200 publications seeking this documentation through interlibrary loans.  I took multiple trips to Europe to look at Egyptian artifacts while searching for these clues.  My search lead me to London to the British Museum, to Paris to the Louvre and to Egypt to Esna, Luxor, Dendera and Cairo.  In the course of 20 years of research, some of my best discoveries were not found in astrological texts but in other fields like archeoastronomy, ancient mathematics and history.  Luck, timing and synchronicity all played their part in piecing the puzzle together. Finally I think I now have enough verification to write about the first of these missing elements to help the advancement of astrology in this new century.  Ancient co-rulerships were:

Dual Rulership

Classic Hellenistic sign and planet rulership

vedicsouthchart (1)Vedic South Chart with Planetary Rulerships

Cancer and Leo are the only signs solely assigned to a single luminary of the Moon and Sun respectively. Then the co-rulership signs go in order of Virgo-Gemini ruled by Mercury, Libra-Taurus ruled by Venus, Scorpio-Aries ruled by Mars, Sagittarius-Pisces ruled by Jupiter, and finally Capricorn-Aquarius ruled by Saturn.

The first big stroke of luck for my research came at the Louvre in 1993.  In the bookstore was a copy of the magazine, Archeologia2 with a picture of the Egyptian Sky Goddess Nut on the cover.   She had the signs of the zodiac running down both sides of her body in the co-rulership order.  It was from the Hellenistic Egyptian period of 200 AD.3  There are at least three of these images documented in various museums.  Inside the lid of the sarcophagus was the planetary order that I had been looking for. The order is very important.  It starts with the two luminary signs of Leo and Cancer on opposite sides of her body.  Leo and Cancer are single rulers and then the co-rulership signs extend down Nut’s body.

Nut color cutGoddess Nut from 200 A.D.

In 1996 I was at the Project Hindsight Conference in Ithaca, NY lead by Robert Hand and Robert Schmidt on Hellenistic Astrology.  The large room was full of astrologers and anonymous academics from Cornell University.  During lunch, I had a conversation with Avery Solomon who had a Ph.D. in Mathematics and taught at Cornell University.  I shared with him that Carl Payne Tobey had claimed that the planetary order assigned to zodiacal signs was based on the average mean distance from the Earth.  Avery had the necessary software on his PC to model the principle of celestial mechanics. He showed me that from the Earth’s point of view, Mercury and Venus did stay behind the Sun the majority of the time. The model confirmed the Hellenistic planetary order. Sadly I didn’t get a copy of his program.  I saw the proof but I didn’t have the solid evidence.

Yet with the discoveries in the Western World by Kepler of planetary motion and Galileo’s re-discovery of the Sun as the center of the Solar System, why did this strange astrological order persist?  The Roman Catholic Cathedral of Vezelay, France still displays the old planetary order but Christ in the center, rather than the Goddess Nut dividing the signs between Cancer and Leo.

Arch Zodiac DrawingThe Roman Catholic Cathedral of Vezelay

The Ancient World believed in keeping knowledge secret so that rulers and priests could maintain power.  Many truths and knowledge were recorded in picture form.  You had to have enough learning to understand the messages left behind.  Most of the mathematical and astronomical discoveries we attribute to the Hellenistic Greeks were already known in Egypt.  They were the great geometric experts in the Ancient World.  The Greeks gained their knowledge from what was left of the Egyptian priesthood.  This is well documented by an expert in ancient measurements, Dr. Livio Stecchini.4  The Egyptians already knew about precession, Pi, Phi, the Golden Mean, right triangles, the Fibonacci numbers and a form of calculus (later discovered by Newton).  They did this with geometry and ratios, long before the use of Arabic numbers or algebra (a form of mathematical notation)5

But much was lost with the conquests of Egypt. We only have pieces and hints of this knowledge through monuments, objects and fragments of texts that have been translated multiple times. The libraries at Heliopolis were destroyed.  The rulers and priests were killed so that the conquerors could control the population.  First there was the Persian Conquest of 525 BC and then Alexander the Great’s conquest of Egypt in 330 BC.   Nick Campion points out that there is a 600-year void of astrological writings after the Fall of Rome in 476 AD.  Hellenistic Greek astrology was preserved by the Arabs and transmitted to Europe during the Arab occupation of southern Spain.  This was the start of the Renaissance, the foundation of medieval astrology and our recovery of Hellenistic astrology.

As astrologers, we have forgotten to look at the astronomy side of this picture for the answers.  Yet, all of our astrological structure is based on sacred geometry, astronomy and mathematics.  The best minds in the Ancient World were astrologers until the Church and the Scientific Revolution (1750 to 1850 AD) suppressed astrology.  We are still recovering this knowledge thanks to serious scholars like James Holden, Robert Zoller, Robert Hand, Robert Schmidt and Benjamin Dykes in reconstructing our past with new translations.  Now we have a new generation of young astrologers trying to put the pieces together like Chris Brennan and others. Add to this the power of computing and the Internet to disperse this reconstructed knowledge.  We can now share this revived knowledge with our colleagues in India and the Arab World.  There is said to be over a million astrological manuscripts to be translated in India, let alone the Arab World and in China.

However, the fundamental issue of planetary order has yet to be explained.  Carl Payne Tobey discovered this answer back in the 1933.  This is because he studied the sacred geometry structure embedded in astrology’s design.  But he left no proof and no references.  It simply wasn’t the style of astrologers in the early to mid 20th century to document.  A good portion of what they discovered for themselves was shared with their private students but not necessarily published.  We can thank James H. Holden for documenting 2,200 astrologer profiles6 and to the few astrological libraries we have in the USA and UK that have preserved 20th century manuscripts so we can recall the work of past astrologers in the prior century.

This is a screen shot of John Mick’s video on the geocentric model of the Sun and Mercury traveling around the Earth.7  He used the real position and velocity data from NASA/JPL.   This is a video on YouTube that I highly recommend watching.  The Earth is at the center.  The Sun is a small dot going around the Earth in a single circle.  The rest of all the curved lines are many years of Mercury transits from the Earth’s point of view.  The key element is that most of Mercury’s transit time is outside the Sun’s circle.  Mercury spends more time behind the Sun from the viewpoint of Earth.  The loops are Mercury stations and retrograde periods.

Mercury Sun Transit B&WMercury and the Sun traveling around Geocentric Earth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhA4bl7B-1M&list=PLEBA7CD7FD2564042&feature=c4-overview-vl

The second image is a screen shot from John Mick’s video of the Sun and Venus traveling around the Earth.8

Venus-Mercury Image.004Venus and the Sun traveling around Geocentric Earth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30yPAUkQ4ds&list=PLEBA7CD7FD2564042

The Earth is in the center of both images.  The Sun is a small dot in a single circle around the Earth.  All the outer circles are either Mercury or Venus moving around the Earth over a period of years.  It is very clear in both images that Mercury and Venus spend more time on the far side of the Sun.  The Sun is closer to Earth during most times of the year than Mercury or Venus.  When the inner planets of Mercury and Venus cross in front of the Sun’s path they slow down and then appear to us as being in retrograde motion. This is the proof that these ancient astrologers knew that the Sun is closest to the Earth, after the Moon, most of the time. They weren’t so stupid after all.  They knew about average mean distance!  Think about it.  If the Egyptians observed Venus as a morning and evening star for hundreds or thousands of years, it’s likely they figured it out that Venus was moving behind the Sun.  The base of the Great Pyramid is a ratio of the circumference of the Earth and each face represents a quarter of the Northern Hemisphere.  I believe the Egyptians knew this fact and showed it in picture form with the Sky Goddess Nut.

This planetary assignment follows a system of logic based on an observable astronomical fact of average mean distance to the Earth.  It brings us to the discovery of the outer planets of Uranus, Neptune and Pluto.  If we maintain this planetary order of average mean distance, then Uranus must be assigned to Aquarius, Neptune to Pisces and Pluto to Aries.  This is not a haphazard assignment done by wishful thinking. This is beyond coincidence.

Carl Tobey discovered this key observation in1933 and published it in 1938 and 1954.  Concerning the modern rulership of sign assignment to planets by average mean distance, Carl deduced:

“If we agree to identify the Moon with the zodiacal sign Cancer, then the accepted system of rulership around the zodiac from Cancer to Pisces  [Moon thru Neptune] in a counter-clockwise direction follows an arithmetical pattern.  It coincides with the mean distance of each body from the earth.  Since the [modern] astrologers did not consider mean distance in associating the planets with the various zodiacal signs, the probability of this pattern conforming with mean distance may be expressed as follows:

___________1____________     =       _____1__

11 x 10 x 9 x 8 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4                6,652,800

Thus, the odds in favor of mean distance from the earth being the factor that determines what the ancients called ‘rulership’ of the planets over the zodiacal signs are 6,652,799 to 1.  From this mathematical point of view alone, Pluto, being the first planet beyond Neptune, must coincide with Aries.  Its nature must be that of Aries.”9

As a minor side note, please remember that one of the original meanings of the word ‘rulership’ is ‘to rule’ or ‘ruler’ also meant to measure or to measure lengths.  I believe this is the original meaning of rulership in astrology.  Rulership is to measure.  Just like the Egyptians were the master geometers, they made Mercury the God of Measurement!

I understand this stirs up the debate about the assignment of Pluto to Aries but it cannot be avoided.10 As a student of modern and traditional astrology, I can understand the avoidance of using the outer planets.  It upsets the Essential Dignities.  The only way to use the Dignities is to use only the old co-rulerships.  Using the old rulerships keeps all the Hellenistic and Medieval rules and techniques in place.  Jyotish astrologers have the same problem using the outer planets in evaluations.  They only use the old co-rulers for the Dignities.  But many Jyotish astrologers do incorporate the newly discovered planets for transits.  This is the recognition of these three new planets having an astrological effect, but no one wants to deal with updating the Dignities.  At least now there is strong evidence that average mean distance from Earth is the basis of the underlying pattern behind Hellenistic planetary order.

There is just too much evidence that the outer planets are real and they work.  At some point these conflicting issues need to be addressed.   Having Uranus on the Ascendant in a natal chart is not the same as having Saturn there by substitution to conform to the Dignities.  Having Jupiter be the ruler of Pisces is not the same as having Neptune as its ruler.  These are poor substitutes considering that we have more than 100 years in studying these planets.  This disturbs Receptions when using more than the ancient seven planets.  When the technique of finding final dispositorship is used, it can give a false answer because of only using the old rulerships.  Modern astrology needs the Dignities revised.  This is necessary in the integration of the traditional and modern astrology for this 21st century.

Footnotes

1.Stecchini, Livio Catullo,“Notes on the Relation of Ancient Measures to the Great Pyramid,” Appendix to  Secrets of the Great Pyramid by Peter Tompkins, Harper and Row 1971, pages 294-5.

2.“Le Zodiaque de Pharaon” by Christiane Desroches-Noblecort, Archeologia Numero 292, Juillet-Aout 1993, pages 21-45

3.http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/article_index/f/the_family_of_soter.aspx  The tomb of the Soter family of Archon of Thebes, discovered in 1820, contained fourteen mummies in rectangular wooden coffins. The coffins belonged to members of the family of Soter, Archon of Thebes. Several of the coffins were inscribed in Greek with Soter’s name and genealogy, which means that they can be dated precisely to the early second century AD. Theban Tomb 32 in the el-Khokha area on the west bank of the Nile.

4.Stecchini, Livio Catullo ,“Notes on the Relation of Ancient Measures to the Great Pyramid,” Appendix to  Secrets of the Great Pyramid by Peter Tompkins, Harper and Row 1971, pages 287-382.

5.http://www.metrum.org/measures/index.htm

6.James H. Holden, Biographical Dictionary of Western Astrologers, A.F.A., 2013.

7.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhA4bl7B-1M&list=PLEBA7CD7FD2564042&feature=c4-overview-vl Published 28 April 2012.

8.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30yPAUkQ4ds&list=PLEBA7CD7FD2564042

9.Carl Payne Tobey’s Collected Works on Astrology, editor Naomi Bennett 1998, p. 162

10.“Does Pluto Rule Scorpio or Aries?” article by Naomi Bennett 1996, www.learnastrologynow.com

The principles of astrology expressed in this article can be found in my book, Foundations of Astrology, in print or ebook on Amazon.

Cover-Stars-Color

Friday, September 25, 2015

2 Comments

  1. You’ve really inspired me with that answer!

  2. Have you observations on the rulerships behind Taurus and Gemini?

    Yes, these observations are in my book, Foundations of Astrology. It is most likely that Eris (discovered in 2005) is the natural ruler of Taurus since it is as large as Pluto and outside of it’s orbit. The astronomer, Mike Brown, in 2016 is speculating that there is another planet beyond Eris that he is looking for. That might be the natural ruler of Gemini.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *